Skip to content
Menu
PersonalAudioNotes
  • Home
  • Who, what and whatnot
    • Who, what
    • …and whatnot
PersonalAudioNotes

final E500 – what’s the difference ?

Posted on 11 July 202012 August 2020

Released not long ago, cheap, apparently difficult to “interpretate”. This is probably the reason why E500 got quite little attention by the reviewers yet. Those I could find are in the usual links here at the bottom.

My own analysis here if you really care

At-a-glance

PROs CONs
Neutral tonality with a somewhat personal timbre Highs could be more lively
Very good performance on binaural tracks Some imaging issue on non-binaural tracks
Soundstage Microphonic cable
Very comfortable (to me at least) 
Very inexpensive 

Full Device Card

Test setup

Fiio X3 mk-III / Fiio BTR5 – Single Ended port. Stock tips. Lossless 16/44.1 – 24/96 – 24/192 FLAC regulat music tracks. Multiple binaural tracks (see below)

Signature analysis

Tonality Very much neutral, with a warm component coming from lack of sparkle on the highs
Sub-Bass Rolled-off but still existant when called for
Mid Bass Fast and tight, very much so considering it comes from a DD. Lean in the quantity. Zero bleeding on the mids.
Mids The best part of the signature (mid bass being second best). Somewhat forward but not too much. Almost neutral but with a taint of warmth, mainly due to highmids not “airy-ing” the overall presentation at all.
Male Vocals Smooth, warmish, quite bodied. Very nice.
Female Vocals Also very nice, bodied, very musical. Impervious to sibilance.
Highs Well refined and smoothed – possibly somewhat too much.
This is no doubt due to binaural-related optimisation, and it makes sense given the intended device purpose, yet this leaves me the feeling of “some lack of energy” on the highmids and trebles, which also contribute to a warmi-ish general timbre.

Technicalities

Soundstage Surprisingly wide, decently deep
Imaging This is an odd case. On some tracks, it’s as precise and consistent as on all other E-series models. On other tracks it’s… erratical. My guess is this comes from binaural-related internal optimisations: imaging on binaural tracks is just “unbelievable”.
Details Just average, not a monster at all.
Instrument separation Also quite average, although free of real congestion
Driveability Demanding. Sensitivity is quite low, most smartphones will not be adequate to natively drive E500.

Physicals

Build Cheap but convincing. Housings are made of sturdy ABS
Fit Bullet shape by definition offering the best fitting options (easy to calibrate depth, angle, orientation etc), but subpar mechanical stability (difficult to keep them “firm in position” during workout for example, sometimes even while talking or yawning)
Comfort Very subjective. I personally find them extremely comfortable. For many, they are unfit for side sleeping though.
Isolation Bullet shape does not offer any concha shielding. Deeper insertion typically helps getter a stronger seal improving isolation too.
Cable Fixed, apparently robust and solidly connected. Wear over-ear to remove microphonics.

Specifications (declared)

Housing ABS
Driver(s) 6.4mm dynamic type
Connector –
Cable OFC black cable, 1.2m
Sensitivity 98 dB
Impedance 16 Ω
Frequency Range –
Rated Power –
MSRP at this post time JPY 2020,00 ($19,00)
[collapse]

Looking at their extremely low price, a few bought a pair maybe just only to get a full set of E-series eartips, arguably amongst the very best silicone eartips applicable to any IEM today, hoping to have “a free spare IEM” with them. I honestly was amongst them. In my case I added an extra nuance like “well let’s see what final people invented again”.

And they did invent something, indeed. E500 is actually a quite unique product inasmuch as merging 3 fundamental values:

  • Good sound quality (neutral-ish signature) and musicality when used to listen to “normal music”
  • Exciting output when used to listen to binaural-recorded or binaural-mixed tracks
  • All this for the price of 2 takeaway pizzas.

Knowing nothing about binaural-what?? when I got them I of course started with the “trivial” application: listen to “normal music”. And well, I found something very similar to E1000 to be honest. Not identical though. A fr-graph comparison is very helpful here to support my notes:

https://crinacle.com/graphs/iems/graphtool/

E500 is the red one.

Those +2dB on the bottom end are very audible and render E1000’s dry sub-bass a perceivable bit “meatier”. I would still call them neutral-ish, but with an accent here.

High mids and especially trebles is where the bigger difference is. A slight less presence in the high-mids and especially a way smoother treble path takes E1000’s tendance to sibilance totally away, and its bright-ish accent too. As a consequence, E500 sounds overall way more relaxed, not bright, not even “clear”, tamed, although of course far from being dark.

One other important difference is sentivity. At the same 16 Ohm impedance as E1000 E500 only ouputs 98dB @ 1mW instead of 102. And this is way evident while using it. Plugged on my Samsung S6 set at 100% volume E500 produces loud-ish pressure but still somewhat muddy sound. It takes more power (e.g. Meizu’s HDP) to make it really enjoyable.

Soundstage is very similar to E1000. Imaging… depends! On some tracks it’s ok, on others how can I call that… “insecure”? Detail retrieval is a bit less than E1000, although it appears to be al lot less if not enough amping is applied to compensate for lower sensitivity.

So, summarising: if E1000 is neutral-slightbright, E500 can be probably be called neutral-relaxed. It’s very enjoyable per se, and it becomes a shining start as soon as you remember it costs less than €20.

Binaural audio (music)

For a good intro to the topic, wikipedia is as always a good friend.

I’ll try to explain here the key concepts (at least those I understood myself).

Think about how music recording and playback happens “normally”: a few microphones are places in front / around the players / singers. This is of course to “better catch” each instrument / voice sound. Each microphone records his own “track”.

Later all such tracks are mixed together and integrated in a single stream with just 2 channels (so called “stereo sound”). The listener, in facts, is presumed to be a human being – having only 2 ears, not one per each microphone that was originally used. The purpose of the game is therefore recombining (mixing) all acquired tracks into a single comprehensive “musical stream” that is as similar as possible to what the listener would have heard if he was “there” in the case of a live performance, or to what the emotion the players originally wanted to transmit in the case of an assembled track.

http://www.mulinetti.it/eng/

Such channels are then played back by 2 loudspeakers placed in a room, one per channel, with the listener sitting front-center to the the speakers, one being displaced a bit on his/her left the other on the right.

All clear till now? Good.

In reality the situation is a tad more complicated but I’m cutting it short now.

Even in this simplified form, think about it: in order to deliver to the listener’s ears a sound as similar as possible to the one he would have heard “being there”, the process actually involves taking many small sound “parts”, sourced as close to the each originating element (instrument or singer) as possible, and then combine them cleverly to artificially reproduce the interactions they have while originally listened to “together”.

Problem: there are technonological limitations to our “combining cleverness”. We simply cannot, or cannot easily / economically enough, rebuild the “entire” comprehensive, integral spatial sensations the user has while “being there to listen”.

What about changing the approach altogether. What about – instead of using many microphones, one per sound source – we using just 2 microphones, 1 per target-listener ear. And while we are at it, what about we putting these microphones actually into a dummy listener head, positioned “on stage” while the original music is being played.

“Cool ! so from now on, or anyway soon in the near future, I look forward into all music recorded like that, as it will be much more realistic. Too bad for the past, I would love to hear like… the Beatles in 3D 😀 “

It’s actually even better than that. When no originally-binaural recording is available, advanced demixing/remixing techniques have been developed that allow for “converting” an existing stereo master into a (let’s call it) “binaural-friendly” version. The accuracy is not exactly the same but it’s brilliant anyway.

Aright, you got the concept. If you want to start your way into knowing more pull a mug of coffe and follow the wikipedia link, or just google around.

Weren’t we talking about E500 ?

Of course we are. Read on.

I’m again using a rough simplification: “binaural” tracks (both binaural-recorded and “simply” binaural-remixed ones) contain “3D cues”, sort of unhearable “hints” telling the drivers (the little speakers inside the headphones) how to “behave” to deliver the maximum 3D fidelity to the listener’s ears.

final’s colophon about E500:

Fully reproduce the acoustic space created with binaural sound

https://snext-final.com/products/eseries/

Yes, E500 is the first IEM by final incorporating the ability to actionate upon 3D cues and reproduce binaural-recorded/mixed tracks in an incredibly realistical way.

From this point of view, it’s quite surprising that – as noted above – E500 is also a good IEM for “normal music”. Still, as final themselves declare, E500 is conceived as a specialty device, fully focused on binaural sound.

It’s quite easy to make a test : if I listen to the following binaural-recorded sample with E1000 or E500 the difference is totally evident.

Binaural Audio -The Nutcracker Suite (H)

Listening with E1000 (or any other IEM granting ample soundstage reproduction) the 3-dimensionality is very evident. Imaging is good, and corresponds very well to what I can see on the video. Then I put E500 on, and I enter a further level: imaging is much more precise and resolved !

So in summary:

E500 is an unbelieavable entry-level opportunity to put my nose ears into binaural, 3D sound at the cost of 2 pizzas.

Even non originally-binaural game audio tracks, such as World of Warcraft’s, are significantly more enjoyable using E500.

Besides all that, it still remains a great neutral-signature IEM, with a sub-chinese price coupled with outstanding sound performances, provided enough juice is supplied by the source.

Further examples

Sneezy “Church In The Morning” : Hooke Live Sessions – Mobile Binaural 3D Audio
JAPANESE DRUM PERFORMANCE | IS JAPAN COOL? MATSURI with KODO – 鼓童
(3D BINAURAL SOUND)
Mahler No. 9 | 3D Sound | 360° Video
https://youtu.be/zGYwInhwbHk
Gustav Mahler: Sinfonie Nr. 9 D-Dur [HD]
Mixed for speakers, this is NOT a binaural recording (included for comparison!)
“Ace Combat Medley” Acoustic Guitar Cover
Binaural recording
“Daredevil” Ace Combat 7 – Acoustic Guitar Duo Cover
“Just” binaural mixing
The Beatles – Come Together (2019 Mix / Audio)
NOT binaurally-remixed
Come Together (Remastered 2009)
Binaurally-remixed

Samples provided by final

https://snext-final.com/products/detail/E500

Binaural sound recorded as a 2ch signal directly by the dummy head microphone

BBC: The whole thing is interesting, but around 4 minutes 47 seconds is especially recommended.
3Dio: In the golf ball scene from around 0 min 25 sec, the image seems to increase the depth of sound.
The Sound Traveler: Experience the Egyptian Pyramid. Pay attention to the difference in sound due to the difference in size and shape of the space.
France television: Pay attention to the distance and direction of sound.
Hear the World in 3D Audio! // Short Film: A typical example of the so-called “sound you normally hear”.

Binaural sound generated by binaural rendering from 3D audio produced multi-channel sound

Radio France: 3D audio live recording by a large-scale orchestra + chorus in a concert hall.
LST: Pay attention to the feeling of sound up and down from 1 minute.
Battlefield 4: The sound of a typical battle shooting game.
*Please be careful when playing back, as this is a video that includes expressive content for people over the age of 17.
Dear Reality GmbH: Pay attention to the overhead passing sound of the flying object from around 0 minutes and 15 seconds.
DavidGX: Notice that the direction of the image and the direction of the sound match, even though the viewpoint changes.
I Drink Lava-3D Game Audio: Focus on the sense of distance between the image and sound objects.
PhilsComputerLab: The image is a simple CG, but please pay attention to the movement of the sound.

Interesting links

  • Head-fi E500 review
  • Trustedreviews E500 review
  • Comparative binaural-nonbinaural experiences – NBBA Forum
  • Etymotic ER4XR: POV/binaural monitoring radical extremist in a nuanced Harman world – NBBA Forum

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • TRN Kirin – inoffensive planar
  • Kinera Hodur review
  • Questyle M15
  • Final F7200 – telling voices apart
  • Ikko OH5 Asgard – music better than the rest

Recent Comments

  • alberto on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • John on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • MrWalkman on Experimenting with Sony NW-A55 & MrWalkman’s DMP-A50 vs DMP-A50R firmware
  • alberto on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)
  • Phil on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020

Categories

  • ACCESSORIES
  • AMP
  • DAC
  • DAC-AMP
  • DAP
  • EARBUDS
  • EDUCATION
  • GREAT STUFF
  • HEADPHONES
  • IEM
  • RANTS
  • TWS

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2023 PersonalAudioNotes | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com