Skip to content
Menu
PersonalAudioNotes
  • Home
  • Who, what and whatnot
    • Who, what
    • …and whatnot
PersonalAudioNotes
K's Earphone Bell LBs

K’s Bell LBs – Neutral reference

Posted on 14 February 202215 February 2022

The earbuds market is so flooded with worthless products all costing like one or two french fries portions, and I got so little time to waste that identifying key reference products on this category is not a trivial task for me.

Here’s my analysis of K’s Earphone “Bell-LBs” model, which I recently personally purchased for € 59,00

Table of contents

  • At-a-glance Card
  • Full Device Card
    • Test setup
    • Signature analysis
    • Technicalities
    • Physicals
    • Specifications (declared)
  • Comparisons
    • vs Rose Mojito (was $ 259,00 – now discountinued)
    • vs Rose Masya (was $ 129,00 – now discountinued)
    • vs K’s Earphone K300 (€58,14 list, € 29,10 street price)
    • vs VE Monk SM (Slim Metal) (€ 22,39)
  • Considerations & conclusions

At-a-glance Card

PROsCONs
Spot-on neutral tonality and pure organic timbre. Low mids and male vocals could use a tad more body.
Spectacular female vocals. Sub bass only hinted.
Very good treble tuning. Some occasional shoutyness on trebles.
Beyond good technicalities. Non removable cable.
Nice fast expressive midbass.
Very comfortable.
Huge value.

Full Device Card

Test setup

Apogee Groove / Sony NW-A55 mrWalkman / Questyle QP1R / Ifi HipDac / Cowon Plenue 2 – full foam and donut foam covers – lossless 16-24/44.1-192 FLAC tracks.

Signature analysis

TonalityBell-LBs sport an almost pure-neutral tonality, and a genuinely organic timbre
Sub-BassSub bass is not “completely” rolled off yet it’s not much more than “hinted” in terms of elevation. That part of actually hearable rumble is sharp and clean.
Mid BassNot elevated but not recessed either, mid bass is fast, very clean and moderately punchy
MidsMids in general are wonderfully tuned, the tonality is spot-on and there’s very good note body, texture and articulation
Male VocalsBell-LBs offers good male vocals although an extra bit of warmth and body would be welcome. I’m being picky though.
Female VocalsFemale voices on Bell-LBs are beyond good: bodied, articulated, realistic. Timbre in particular is incredibly organic.
HighsTreble is reasonably extended, clean, sparkly. Some missing refinement makes them go shouty on some occasions and specific tracks. There is “some” air too, although not too much.

Technicalities

SoundstageBell-LBs cast a seriously wide and high stage, with a quite modest depth though
ImagingMacrodynamics are close to fantastic on Bell-LBs: instruments and voices are properly distributed on the scene with plenty of space and separating air
DetailsDetail retrieval is very good, both from the highmids and trebles – where is it solely limited on passages where Bell-LBs scant into shouty territory – and from the mid-bass thanks to their speed and at least decent texturing
Instrument separationInstrument separation are as goood as imaging, and fall short only on some very occasional passages due to incurred treble shoutyness
DriveabilityBell-LBs are reasonably easy to drive from the pure powering standpoint with their 30 ohm paired to above average sensitivity. Their driver is technical enough to “welcome” a good quality source though. Pairing with Apogee Groove in particular is nothing short of delicious.

Physicals

BuildShells appear convincingly solid, so does the cable and its termination.
FitAlthough the shape seems odd at first look, Bell-LBs fit very well over the concha. To me, the best orientation is cable-up. I can’t decide if I prefer them with full foams or donuts… probably the former option gets my vote but by a tiny margin indeed.
ComfortOnce fitted, I find them super comfortable.
IsolationAlmost zero, as normal in the earbud category
CableThe non-replaceable cable is free from microphonics. Sadly the manufacturer does not offer the possibility to order the product with different terminations, 3.5mm is the sole available option.

Specifications (declared)

HousingFull metal bell-shaped housings
Driver(s)15mm single Dynamic Driver
Connectorn/a
CableFixed 1.2m single ended cable, 3.5mm straight plug
Sensitivity105dB/mW
Impedance30 Ω
Frequency Range10-40000Hz
Package & Accessories2 pairs of black full foams, 2 pairs of white full foams, 2 pairs of black donut foams, 2 pairs of white donut foams, 1 pair of rubber earhooks
MSRP at this post time€ 123,31 list price (€ 59,28 “usual” discounted price)

Comparisons

vs Rose Mojito (was $ 259,00 – now discountinued)

Both are designed for with a neutral presentation in mind, but when directly compared Bell-LBs comes out “flatter-neutral” while Mojito sounds a bit more “balanced”.

Mojito delivers more sub-bass and a modest rumble vs just a hint of that on Bell-LBs. Midbass are similar in note body, Mojito offering a bit more elevation. Mids and vocals are equivalently refined and organic, very difficult to tell which is better. On both, male are “just good”, female are “wonderful”.

Neither driver ever scants into sibilance, but Bell-LBs do occasionally concede to shoutyness, which Mojito is totally free of. Stage casting is similar, Bell-LBs being just a bit deeper.

Imaging and separation are surely better on Mojito mainly thanks to the absence of treble shoutiness. Bell-LBs are way easier to drive and pair.

vs Rose Masya (was $ 129,00 – now discountinued)

Masya offer a bright-accented presentation vs a virtually pure-neutral coming out of Bell-LBs. Both buds deliver a just hinted sub-bass, with barely audible rumble. Midbass are similar, with Masya showing a bit more elevation.

Mids are better tuned on Bell_LBs which deliver thicker tone body and higher organicity. Vocals are hands-down better on Bell-LBs, female even more than male. Both drivers present a tendence to (occasional) shoutyness on trebles on some tracks, Masya more than Bell-LBs.

Technicalities are also very similar, with Bell-LBs showing just a bit more stage depth in comparison. Bell-LBs are much easier to drive and pair.

vs K’s Earphone K300 (€58,14 list, € 29,10 street price)

By design K300 indeed offer a different tuning compared to Bell-LBs: warm and V-shaped vs neutral. K300’s sub bass is very audible and delivers nice rumble, on par with quite a few IEMs actually, and unlike Bell-LBs where it is just hinted.

Mid bass is more elevated, bloomier, denser on K300 vs Bell-LBs’ leaner, faster, punchier one. Mids are obviously recessed and also leaner on K300, vs unrecessed bodied and organic on Bell-LBs.

High mids and trebles are similarly elevated on both, but obvsiouly cleaner, sparklier, airier on Bell-LBs, and brushed, warmed and inoffensive on K300.

Soundstage casting is very similar, in both cases absolutely holographic, a further bit more extended on K300. Imaging and separation are evidently much better on Bell-LBs as a direct consequence of much faster transiets all over the spectrum.

K300 is somewhat harder to drive due to its 300 ohm impedance, and less expensive.

vs VE Monk SM (Slim Metal) (€ 22,39)

Monk SM tonality is bright-neutral vs Bell-LBs being almost pure neutral. Both have just hinted sub-bass. Mid-bass is similar on both, a bit more elevated and organic on Bell-LBs.

Mids and especially vocals are monumentally better on Bell-LBs, whereas Monk SM sound deeply artificial, in addition to lean and untextured.

High mids and trebles are also arguably much more organic on Bell-LBs, shouty and fatiguing on Monk SM. Monk SM cast a deeper but narrower stage.

Detail retrieval on Monk SM is not as bad as their high mids and treble lack of refinement might imply, but Bell-LBs keep the lead with good margin. Microdynamics are also evidently better on Bell-LBs.

Both drivers are quite easy to bias power-wise, but Monk SM is way more capricious in terms of pairing (some sources excite their highmids making them sound like a portable transistor radio from the ’70ies).

Considerations & conclusions

K’s Earphone BELL-LBs are a pair a earbuds that acoustic and vocal music lovers may easily fall in love with.

They tick so many boxes at once: neutral tonality, spot-on timbre, comfortable fit, high resolving power, holographic stage casting and good technicalities, all paired with decent driveability and an affordable price.

Sure there is better at higher budget levels, but I couldn’t find anything remotely close in terms of sound quality on an almost purely neutral tonality at such a modest cost.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • TRN Kirin – inoffensive planar
  • Kinera Hodur review
  • Questyle M15
  • Final F7200 – telling voices apart
  • Ikko OH5 Asgard – music better than the rest

Recent Comments

  • alberto on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • John on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • MrWalkman on Experimenting with Sony NW-A55 & MrWalkman’s DMP-A50 vs DMP-A50R firmware
  • alberto on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)
  • Phil on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020

Categories

  • ACCESSORIES
  • AMP
  • DAC
  • DAC-AMP
  • DAP
  • EARBUDS
  • EDUCATION
  • GREAT STUFF
  • HEADPHONES
  • IEM
  • RANTS
  • TWS

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Contents

  • At-a-glance Card
  • Full Device Card
    • Test setup
    • Signature analysis
    • Technicalities
    • Physicals
    • Specifications (declared)
  • Comparisons
    • vs Rose Mojito (was $ 259,00 – now discountinued)
    • vs Rose Masya (was $ 129,00 – now discountinued)
    • vs K’s Earphone K300 (€58,14 list, € 29,10 street price)
    • vs VE Monk SM (Slim Metal) (€ 22,39)
  • Considerations & conclusions
©2023 PersonalAudioNotes | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com