Skip to content
Menu
PersonalAudioNotes
  • Home
  • Who, what and whatnot
    • Who, what
    • …and whatnot
PersonalAudioNotes
BL05S

BLON BL05S – Very nice

Posted on 24 January 20213 April 2021


I’m not the finest and most through connaisseur of the sub-$50 IEM bracket so I cant really offer a final word – and probably not even a semi-final one – about how BL05S fare towards their most direct competition. Limited to my direct experiences I must say I’ve been impressed: these things sounds very well, truth be told.

BL05 are not perfect of course – their main technical flaw is the missing sub-bass rumble – and probably not “mesmerising” either, yet a special word is definitely deserved by their technical capabilities at space and imaging rendering which I found really remarkable, and the very elegant compromised reached in the highs between livelyness and unoffensiveness.

Considering the total failure at stock cable and tips and the consequent need to swap them instantly, the price also didnt strike me either. As a pure example, final E1000 offer a better value for money (on a different timbre though!). But that being told, I find BL05S definitely recommendable.

I got this pair of WGZBLON BL05S as a review unit from my friends at KEEPHIFI (www.keephifi.com) entrusting me to an unbiased analysis and openhearted subjective evaluation, which is what I’m reporting here above and below. You can purchase BL05S at their store.

At-a-glance Card

PROsCONs
Good stage and very good imaging. Missing sub-bass.
Nice punchy clean midbass. Need to upgrade cable and tips.
Very nice compromise treble tuning.

Full Device Card

Test setup

Sources: Apogee Groove / Questyle QP1R / Sony NW-A55 mrWalkman – Sedna Earfit Light eartips – Nicehck 16core High Purity Copper cable – lossless 16-24/44.1-192 FLAC tracks.

Signature analysis

TonalityBL05S’s timbre is neutral-ish with a modest bass bump. Tonality is a mild V (almost a U) with no excesses anywhere, and nice vividness.
Sub-BassAbruptly rolled-off, rumble is missing
Mid BassVery good speed/meat compromise – for my taste as least. BL05S are definitely in DD-buttery territory, with a bump-up in terms of loudness, but a speedier transient tuning avoids bleed/bloat into the mids, or keeps it at very reasonable levels. Texturing is above decent too. Softer silicon tips like final E-clears tend to dry-up midbass further, which might be welcome depending on personal taste and musical genre.
MidsMids are moderately recessed but well tuned nonetheless. Not lean, but not bodied either and especially not particularly textured. The higher end has a very modest tendance to glare out at higher volumes.
Male VocalsQuite nice. On the lean-ish side, still close to “natural” sounding.
Female VocalsOverall quality similar to male vocals, with the additional note of high registers tending to swish-up a tad sometimes. Not shouty nor screechy, but sometimes uniformity is a bit lacking. They also stay way from sibilance except some very rare times when they come close to it.
HighsWell done, really. Much like midbass, here too I hear a very nice compromise, in this case between livelyness and polishing. High mids and Presence are vivid and quite engaging. After them there’s a a quick reduction but with some subsequent bump-ups which add some extra detail and especially air, all while never getting sharp let alone screechy. I do hear a veeeery slight metallic tint sometime but that’s it.

Technicalities

SoundstageStage is presented as nicely wide, and with a very good sense of verticality; depth is just hinted – although not zero. Specific sources like Groove make depth better but that happens with just about any driver
ImagingTogether with separation it’s clearly one of the best parts of the product. Within the limits of stage reconstruction it’s also not flattened onto the L-R axis as so many other IEMs in this price bracket do.
DetailsNot a monster at microdetail retrieval, BL05S does anyway deliver quite some nice highmids and treble details when called for.
Instrument separationThis obviusly depends on source quality but beyond that separation is the other “above its price” point together with imaging. Instruments are correctly differentiated in all occasions, only in the most crowded occasions – both on bass and trebles – some in-between shades layers get partially pasted. But I honestly need to pull drivers costing way more from the drawer to do better.
DriveabilityExtremely easy powerwise – even too much – output quality stays more than acceptable even when scaling source quality from my usual devices down to some more ordinary stuff like X3-III or a Meizu dongle – what mostly happens in such case is bass getting muddier and trebles less brilliant (i.e. the typical noise related effects).

Physicals

BuildHousings solidity and resistance are quite convincing. Design is very “stalwart”: love or hate it.
FitCan only be worn cable-up of course, and nozzles are not long. Non-short tips are required, longer ones do facilitate the fit, which is quite firm when set. Stock tips are just terrible. After the usual painstaking rolling session I found Sedna Earfit Lights are the best overall compromise for me also considering their relative length. Alternative choice for me are final E-clears.
ComfortIn my case it’s just OK. Not the most “disappearing once worn” housings, yet their shape is quite comfortable for me.
IsolationGood, once properly fitted
CableAn authentic piece of stinky crap, binned instantly. The good news is a cheap ($10-ish) Nicehck 16c High Purity Copper cable is perfectly adequate sound wise.

Specifications (declared)

HousingZin-Alloy die-cast shells, in a light-aquamarineish-green tint with golden inserts.
Driver(s)One 3rd generation 10mm Carbon Diaphragm Dynamic Driver
Connector2pin 0.78mm
Cable1.2mm special (?) cable, with 3.5mm male angle single ended termination, with mic and remote
Sensitivity108 dB
Impedance32 Ω
Frequency Range20-20000Hz
Package and accessoriesSoft carry pouch, 1 set (S/M/L) silicon tips
MSRP at this post time$90,00 ($45,00 apparently “permanent” deal price)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • TRN Kirin – inoffensive planar
  • Kinera Hodur review
  • Questyle M15
  • Final F7200 – telling voices apart
  • Ikko OH5 Asgard – music better than the rest

Recent Comments

  • alberto on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • John on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • MrWalkman on Experimenting with Sony NW-A55 & MrWalkman’s DMP-A50 vs DMP-A50R firmware
  • alberto on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)
  • Phil on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020

Categories

  • ACCESSORIES
  • AMP
  • DAC
  • DAC-AMP
  • DAP
  • EARBUDS
  • EDUCATION
  • GREAT STUFF
  • HEADPHONES
  • IEM
  • RANTS
  • TWS

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2023 PersonalAudioNotes | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com