Skip to content
Menu
PersonalAudioNotes
  • Home
  • Who, what and whatnot
    • Who, what
    • …and whatnot
PersonalAudioNotes
K300

K’s Earphone K300

Posted on 15 February 202215 February 2022

After having met a lot of satisfaction on another K’s Earphone bud (Bell-LBs – follow the link to read my analysis) I decided to renew my trust in this manufacturer by purchasing their K300 model, which promises a quite different tuning and presentation, and still costs a very affordable € 29,00.

Table of contents

  • At-a-glance Card
  • Full Device Card
    • Test setup
    • Signature analysis
    • Technicalities
    • Physicals
    • Specifications (declared)
  • Comparisons
    • vs K’s Earphone Bell-LBs (€59,00 street price)
  • Considerations & conclusions

At-a-glance Card

PROsCONs
Smooth, relaxing, warm presentation. Warm coloration may be not for everyone.
Extended and pleasant bass and sub bass. Limits on imaging and separation.
Holographic very extended soundstage. Not very easy to drive.
Comfortable.
Very good value

Full Device Card

Test setup

Apogee Groove / Sony NW-A55 mrWalkman / Questyle QP1R / Ifi HipDac / Cowon Plenue 2 – donut foam covers – lossless 16-24/44.1-192 FLAC tracks.

Signature analysis

TonalityK300 offer a mild V-shape presentation. Tonality is definitely warm, with an evident bass prevalence. Timbre is somewhat soft and mellow.
Sub-BassSub-bass is very extended for an earbud, and there is actual rumble.
Mid BassMid bass is elevated and not fast. The result is a dominant presence, carrying a quite pleasant, mild flowery nature. On the other hand it’s lacking in terms of precision and texture.
MidsMid tones are recessed on the K300, and they also get “tinted” by the bass’ warmth. Apart from that they come accross quite well articulated.
Male VocalsMale voices are good on K300, although made too warm by the bass presence.
Female VocalsFemale vocals are very smooth, nicely textured, totally inoffensive – forget any form of sibilance or shoutyness – but they are too warm and could definitely use more brightness and clarity
HighsTrebles are very good in structure and timbre, while also “brushed” and “warmed up” by the general tonality, and as such they leave sparkles to be desired. The good news is that they are present enough to be enjoyable, and totally inoffensive for a very relaxed and unfatiguing listen.

Technicalities

SoundstageK300 cast a full-holographic stage, with particularly significant width and depth
ImagingPositioning is ok, although the general warmth gives the impressions of “less air” between instruments.
DetailsDetail retrieval is quite limited from the bass (drowning under bloomy transients there) and somewhat better on highmids and trebles, although still not something to write home about there, either.
Instrument separationSome concession is made here on the bass transients altar.
DriveabilityNot particularly easy due to the significant impedance (300 ohm), but it does not take nuclear plant either. Just avoid a mere phone and you should be set. Ah, and avoid warm sources too!

Physicals

BuildShells are plastic MX500-standards.
FitEasy fit (for me) as per MX500 standard. Best orientation is cable-up. Due to the apriori warm tuning, donut foams (or no foams at all) are highly recommended in this case.
ComfortAlthough not my deepest love, I do find MX500 shells reasonably comfortable once fitted.
IsolationAlmost zero, as normal in the earbud category
CableThe fixed 2-core sheated cable appears very ordinary. It’s free from microphonics, there’s at least that.

Specifications (declared)

HousingMX500 full plastic
Driver(s)Single DD
Connectorn/a
CableFixed, 1.2m single ended 3.5mm straight plug
Sensitivityn/a
Impedance300 Ω
Frequency Range15-25000Hz
Accessories and package1 pair of black full foams, 1 pair of white full foams, 1 pair of black donut foams, 1 pair of white donut foams
MSRP at this post time€ 29,10 street price

Comparisons

vs K’s Earphone Bell-LBs (€59,00 street price)

By design K300 indeed offer a different tuning compared to Bell-LBs: warm and V-shaped vs neutral. K300’s sub bass is very audible and delivers nice rumble, on par with quite a few IEMs actually, and unlike Bell-LBs where it is just hinted. Mid bass is more elevated, bloomier, denser on K300 vs Bell-LBs’ leaner, faster, punchier one.

Mids are obviously recessed and also leaner on K300, vs unrecessed bodied and organic on Bell-LBs. Highmids and trebles are similarly elevated on both, but obvsiouly cleaner, sparklier, airier on Bell-LBs, and brushed, warmed and inoffensive on K300.

Soundstage casting is very similar, in both cases absolutely holographic, a further bit more extended on K300. Imaging and separation are evidently much better on Bell-LBs as a direct consequence of much faster transiets all over the spectrum. K300 is somewhat harder to drive due to its 300 ohm impedance, and less expensive.

Considerations & conclusions

K300 are another definite hit by K’s Earphone, the same makers of BELL-LBs. They deliver a very well calibrated warm-bass tonality and a stunning holographic very extended stage, offering a really pleasing, relaxing musical experience.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • TRN Kirin – inoffensive planar
  • Kinera Hodur review
  • Questyle M15
  • Final F7200 – telling voices apart
  • Ikko OH5 Asgard – music better than the rest

Recent Comments

  • alberto on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • John on Intime Miyabi – uniquely special
  • MrWalkman on Experimenting with Sony NW-A55 & MrWalkman’s DMP-A50 vs DMP-A50R firmware
  • alberto on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)
  • Phil on Fiio BTR5 : great sound, terrible vendor value (and I won’t buy Fiio anymore)

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • April 2022
  • February 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020

Categories

  • ACCESSORIES
  • AMP
  • DAC
  • DAC-AMP
  • DAP
  • EARBUDS
  • EDUCATION
  • GREAT STUFF
  • HEADPHONES
  • IEM
  • RANTS
  • TWS

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Contents

  • At-a-glance Card
  • Full Device Card
    • Test setup
    • Signature analysis
    • Technicalities
    • Physicals
    • Specifications (declared)
  • Comparisons
    • vs K’s Earphone Bell-LBs (€59,00 street price)
  • Considerations & conclusions
©2023 PersonalAudioNotes | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com